Harry Potter 6 Movie Review

So, what does the sixth movie hold for us ?
First I'd like to briefly expose my sentiments concerning Harry Potter and the first five movies. I'm a huge fan of the books, I especially like that they are so immersive. While the first movie is clearly inferior to the book, it's actually quite good. Second movie is also not bad, but could be slightly beter. The third and the fourth however are total rubish. It's more a juxtaposition of key scenes, which totally breaks the immersivity. The movies have notably less "school" scenes and a broken rythm when compared to the books (and don't get started about the tree going trough the different seasons - sooo clever ><). That brings us to the fifth movie, which is actually quite similar to the sixth.
Those two are similar because they are more rooted in the schoolyear routine than the previous episodes. The final events aren't straightforward consequences of the things that happen during the year. There are lot of tips of course - but those are mingled with "normal life". I'll stop a second to note that this kind of detail-mingling is one of the great strengths of JK Rowling's writing, continually giving tips about things to come and a wealth of information that the reader is always delighted to know. This is an aspect the movies don't capture very well, rather treating each clue given to the viewers as a separate block, to be appended to other blocks.
I consider therefore 5 and 6 to be superior to 3 and 4, not due to better filming, but rather due to the content of the books. David Yates (director of 5 and 6) can definetely not beat the work done by Chris Colombus on 1 and 2. He's in many regards event worse than Alfonso Cuaron and Mike Newell (respectively directors of 3 and 4). I'll even go as far as to say that he's a total morron. Cause it's now time to expose griefs.
While the change introduced to the book by Chris Colombus where mostly sensible, his successors insisted to add stupid "cinematic" sequences (mostly stunts and special effects ...) and to drop more casual parts of the story - parts which as I said earlier made the book interesting. This has reached ridiculous proportions in episode 6, where capital scenes are awfully truncated, many subplots removed and even more useless scenes added (most notably death eaters burning down Weasley's house and 5 whole minutes spent mending a room).
Conclusion, Harry Potter 6 is not a total waste, but it's not the movie it could have been if confied to competent people. A waste, but if you're a fan you'll probably watch it anyway. If not, you might as well stay home. It might be worthwhile to add here that if you didn't read the book, understanding the plot might be quite complicated (this totally struck me afterwards).
As a side note, my initial reaction was to say "Well, it's not spectacular, but it's not that bad". But that was before I re-read the book (I re-read the seven books, but had only begun the sixth when I went to the theater).











Comments [0]